1. But really, when you look at the family history, we-all knowthat for each and every code you will find an exception. A good vexing point ofgenealogy is that nobody very knows just how to make use of brand new exceptions orrules which have one decisive adjective such usually, maybe, probably,most likely, an such like. It will be fascinating if indeed there most other advice ofjointures are generated annually or a couple shortly after a known relationship go out.
2. Could there be a keen extant dispensation for the wedding out of ElizabethClifford and you may Sir Ralph Bowes who have been third cousins via Henry Fitzhugh,third Lord Fitzhugh or next cousins, immediately following taken from the brand new fifth LordClifford? Who does narrow down the marriage day.
Arthur
Presumably, when the a great dispensation is actually looked for and provided, it can havebeen from the one of the following, and can even come in the latest correspondingregister guide, if it endures:
Thomas Savage, Archbishop regarding York 1501-1507Christopher Bainbridge, Bishop regarding Durham 1507-1508, Archbishop away from York1508-1514William Senhouse, Bishop regarding Durham 1502-1505Thomas Ruthall, Bishop out of Durham 1509-1523Richard Leyburn, Bishop of Carlisle 1502-1508John Cent, Bishop away from Carlisle 1509-1520
5. In case the tenth Lord Clifford does get married during the early 1487 [say January] andhas Age later on for the reason that year, do brand new chronology not performs?
John arms?
E born in later 1487, Henry produced into the 1488/nine, Joan in the ,etc. completing new brands of your upload of . If (a) thechronology nevertheless performs; and (b) her marriage section wasn’t low; thenwe only have this new 1505 pedigree of Henry VII’s that’s inside the oppositionto the new conjecture you to definitely she is actually a valid daughter.
six. Regarding the 1505 pedigree: May be the Clifford daughters the latest onlyknown Henry VII interactions excluded? Are there others? In this case,won’t one mirror improperly on this subject document just like the a source?
Away from contrasting We have made of brand new c.1505 Henry VII Connections pedigreeswith the latest 1480-1500 Visitation of one’s Northern pedigrees, which can be
On c.1505 Relations pedigrees, the latest Clifford children are not listedin a good Clifford pedigree, but alternatively throughout the St. John pedigree. While the I’mnot regularly the new St. John loved ones, following ‘s the pointers asit appears from the c.1505 pedigree, since the extracted from brand new 1834 Coll. Best. etGen. blog post. The brand new phrasing from inside the quotations is strictly because it appears inthe 1834 blog post (pp. 310-311).
“Zero. XII.”Regarding my Lord Welles daughter, Sir Richard Rod, Domme Verney, SirJohn St. John, with other.”f.288, 296, 317, 318.”Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset had about three husbands.” From the “John Duke ofSomerset” she got “My personal Woman the fresh King’s Mom.” who had “The brand new Queen.” whohad “Prince “By “Sir Oliver Saint John, very first spouse.” she had step 3 daus & dos sons:
An excellent. “Edith, married so you can Geoffrey Rod off Buckinghamshire.” They’d:A1. “Sir Richard Pole, Knt. wedded on the Woman Margaret, dau. of theDuke of Clarence.” That they had: “Harry. “A2. “Alianor, married so you’re able to Ralph Verney, Esq.” That they had: “John Verney.—– [youngster, unnamed]. ——-[yet another youngster, unnamed].”
B. “John Ssint John, esq who is the most beautiful girl in San Diego, CA in USA.” He previously five college students:B1. “Sir John Saint John, Knight.” who’d “Five daughters and you can oneson.”B2. “Anne, wedd. in order to Harry Lord Clifford.” That they had “Jane. Mabill.Henry, young man and heir. Anne. Thomas. Alianor.”B3. “E, married to help you Thomas Kent, Esq. out of Lincolnshire.”B4. “A beneficial Nun regarding Shaftesbury.”B5. “Oliver Saint John.”
C. “Dame Mary, married so you can Sir Richard Frognall.” That they had:C1. “Edmond Frognall along with his brethren and sistren.” With issueindicated, but not called.C2. “E, wedded to help you Sir William Gascoigne, Knt.”
D. “Elizabeth, married very first into Lord Zouche; immediately after with the LordScrope from Bolton.” Issue:D1. [from the Zouche] ” Catesby.” They had:”E. George. John. William.”D2. [from the Scrope] ” Conyers.” With issueindicated not named.
Margaret Duchess regarding Somerset, of the “Lionel Lord Welles, history partner.”had: “John Viscount Welles, wedded Cecily, dau. out of K. Edward IV.” andthey had “Age.”